Peer Effects across Firms: Evidence from Security Analysts
نویسندگان
چکیده
We study peer effects among workers in the same occupation across firms in the context of security analysts (i.e., we study whether the productivity of a worker is a function of her peers in other firms). We use microdata concerning analysts as well as an identification strategy that employs one feature of social networks: the existence of partially overlapping peer group. The results show strong evidence of spillovers in terms of peers’ outcomes and characteristics. We find a significant positive causal effect of peers’ accuracy on an analysts’ accuracy. For example, a one standard deviation in peers’ earnings forecast accuracy increases an analyst’s accuracy by 25.7%. We also find that peers’ characteristics have a significant effect on earnings forecast accuracy, and the estimate of the social multiplier is around 1.46. ∗First Draft: August 2014. The University of Texas at Austin McCombs School of Business, 2110 Speedway, Stop B6600, Austin, TX 78712 ([email protected]). I would like to thank Clemens Sialm, Jonathan Cohn, Robert Parrino, Karsten Muller and seminar participants at the University of Texas at Austin, and 18th IZA Summer School in Labor Economics and LBS TransAtlantic Doctoral Conference.
منابع مشابه
Common Analyst –Based Method for Defining Peer Firms
We develop a method for defining groups of peer firms based on having sufficiently many common sell-side analysts. Besides industry boundaries, analysts’ coverage choices can reflect other important aspects of firm relatedness. We find that the common analysts -method produces substantially more homogenous groups of firms compared to standard industry classifications, and has a number of other ...
متن کاملThe determinants of capital structure across firms’ sizes: The U.K evidence
This paper explores the leverage determinants across firms’ sizesbased on the two main theories behind the capital structure, the trade-offand the pecking order theories. A panel data is sued to find therelationship between capital structure and the variables that proxy forbenefits and costs of debt during 1990 to 2006. Our findings show thatboth principles help to explain the capital structure...
متن کاملPlaying to the Gallery: Corporate Policies and Equity Research Analysts
It is well known that equity analysts choose to cover firms about which they have favorable views. We exploit this fact and use analysts’ coverage decisions to infer their preferences for corporate policies. Next, we show that firms cater to analysts’ preferences. Firms exogenously losing analyst coverage subsequently change their corporate policies away from the preferences of the analyst that...
متن کاملAnalysts’ Responses to Earnings Management
Previous literature studying analysts’ earnings forecasts examines their properties without considering firms’ response to analysts’ forecasts. This study improves upon previous research by considering firms’ earnings management with respect to analysts’ forecasts. I hypothesize that analysts understand firms’ earnings management practices, and incorporate firms’ expected behavior into their fo...
متن کاملDo German Security Analysts Herd?
In this study, we employ an innovative new methodology suggested by Bernhardt et al. (2006) to examine the herding (or anti-herding) behavior of German analysts in case of earnings forecasts. Our methodology avoids well-known shortcomings often encountered in related studies, such as, e.g., correlated information signals, unexpected common shocks to earnings, systematic optimism or pessimism or...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016